1932
"His depictions, which have since acquired a more restrained line, make him more clearly recognizable as a modern, worldly romantic who studies his contemporaries with objectivity and, despite the sharpness of the reproduction, makes them appear like images in a magic mirror. Things, people and events are stripped of their dark tragedy, and one can already sense the cheerful sun behind the clouds. The press drawing for the picture forgery trial Mulley - Nuremberg 1932 in particular expresses Körner's warm-hearted attitude very well. One can sense his human compassion both for those who have become guilty of who knows how, and for the experts, for whom dignity and task also seem to cause grief." Otto Franz Kutscher Archive for the book trade and commercial graphics / 7th issue / 71st year / 1934 / Leipzig / Pages 370-371. The highly sought-after landscape painter Oskar Mulley (1891-1949) successfully brought a plagiarism trial in Nuremberg in 1932. The defendants were the Nuremberg art dealer Hermann Fischer, the merchant Joseph Laux, the art dealer Wolfgang Blödel von Egloffstein and the merchant Heinrich Bimmerer von Nuremberg. They and other defendants were accused of committing a picture fraud and selling works in the style of Oskar Mulley that were labeled Mulley-Mchn. The forger was allegedly Fritz Blädel.Feedback geben
photo 2024, Theo Noll
1932
Detailed view
"His depictions, which have since acquired a more restrained line, make him more clearly recognizable as a modern, worldly romantic who studies his contemporaries with objectivity and, despite the sharpness of the reproduction, makes them appear like images in a magic mirror. Things, people and events are stripped of their dark tragedy, and one can already sense the cheerful sun behind the clouds. The press drawing for the picture forgery trial Mulley - Nuremberg 1932 in particular expresses Körner's warm-hearted attitude very well. One can sense his human compassion both for those who have become guilty of who knows how, and for the experts, for whom dignity and task also seem to cause grief." Otto Franz Kutscher Archive for the book trade and commercial graphics / 7th issue / 71st year / 1934 / Leipzig / Pages 370-371. The highly sought-after landscape painter Oskar Mulley (1891-1949) successfully brought a plagiarism trial in Nuremberg in 1932. The defendants were the Nuremberg art dealer Hermann Fischer, the merchant Joseph Laux, the art dealer Wolfgang Blödel von Egloffstein and the merchant Heinrich Bimmerer von Nuremberg. They and other defendants were accused of committing a picture fraud and selling works in the style of Oskar Mulley that were labeled Mulley-Mchn. The forger was allegedly Fritz Blädel.Feedback geben
photo 2024, Theo Noll
1932
Detailed view
"His depictions, which have since acquired a more restrained line, make him more clearly recognizable as a modern, worldly romantic who studies his contemporaries with objectivity and, despite the sharpness of the reproduction, makes them appear like images in a magic mirror. Things, people and events are stripped of their dark tragedy, and one can already sense the cheerful sun behind the clouds. The press drawing for the picture forgery trial Mulley - Nuremberg 1932 in particular expresses Körner's warm-hearted attitude very well. One can sense his human compassion both for those who have become guilty of who knows how, and for the experts, for whom dignity and task also seem to cause grief." Otto Franz Kutscher Archive for the book trade and commercial graphics / 7th issue / 71st year / 1934 / Leipzig / Pages 370-371. The highly sought-after landscape painter Oskar Mulley (1891-1949) successfully brought a plagiarism trial in Nuremberg in 1932. The defendants were the Nuremberg art dealer Hermann Fischer, the merchant Joseph Laux, the art dealer Wolfgang Blödel von Egloffstein and the merchant Heinrich Bimmerer von Nuremberg. They and other defendants were accused of committing a picture fraud and selling works in the style of Oskar Mulley that were labeled Mulley-Mchn. The forger was allegedly Fritz Blädel.Feedback geben
photo 2024, Theo Noll
1932
Detailed view
"His depictions, which have since acquired a more restrained line, make him more clearly recognizable as a modern, worldly romantic who studies his contemporaries with objectivity and, despite the sharpness of the reproduction, makes them appear like images in a magic mirror. Things, people and events are stripped of their dark tragedy, and one can already sense the cheerful sun behind the clouds. The press drawing for the picture forgery trial Mulley - Nuremberg 1932 in particular expresses Körner's warm-hearted attitude very well. One can sense his human compassion both for those who have become guilty of who knows how, and for the experts, for whom dignity and task also seem to cause grief." Otto Franz Kutscher Archive for the book trade and commercial graphics / 7th issue / 71st year / 1934 / Leipzig / Pages 370-371. The highly sought-after landscape painter Oskar Mulley (1891-1949) successfully brought a plagiarism trial in Nuremberg in 1932. The defendants were the Nuremberg art dealer Hermann Fischer, the merchant Joseph Laux, the art dealer Wolfgang Blödel von Egloffstein and the merchant Heinrich Bimmerer von Nuremberg. They and other defendants were accused of committing a picture fraud and selling works in the style of Oskar Mulley that were labeled Mulley-Mchn. The forger was allegedly Fritz Blädel.Feedback geben
photo 2024, Theo Noll
Please let us know your opinion about our website, the museum, our idea or any other evaluation. We shall be please about any comments and suggestions..